Discussion:
[Talk-br] Digest Talk-br, volume 102, assunto 24
Luis Bahiana
2017-03-17 16:49:40 UTC
Permalink
Se precisarem de ajuda para tradução ou versão coloco-me a disposição

2017-03-14 13:23 GMT-03:00 <talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>:

> Enviar submissões para a lista de discussão Talk-br para
> talk-***@openstreetmap.org
>
> Para se cadastrar ou descadastrar via WWW, visite o endereço
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
> ou, via email, envie uma mensagem com a palavra 'help' no assunto ou
> corpo da mensagem para
> talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org
>
> Você poderá entrar em contato com a pessoa que gerencia a lista pelo
> endereço
> talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org
>
> Quando responder, por favor edite sua linha Assunto assim ela será
> mais específica que "Re: Contents of Talk-br digest..."
>
>
> Tópicos de Hoje:
>
> 1. Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network
> (man_made=survey_points) (Sérgio V.)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:22:41 +0000
> From: Sérgio V. <***@hotmail.com>
> To: "talk-***@openstreetmap.org" <talk-***@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: [Talk-br] Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network
> (man_made=survey_points)
> Message-ID:
> <***@RO1P152MB0810.
> LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Bom dia pessoal, estou preparando a proposta abaixo para o
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/.
>
> Por favor sintam-se livres para examinar.
>
> Antecipadamente obrigado.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Hello.
> I'm member of brazilian OSM users community.
> I present here for discussion, and asking approval for, the proposal for
> the import of brazilian geodetic network of survey points (SGB - Sistema
> Geodésico Brasileiro).
> Firstly, sorry if not good english. Also sorry for the technical problems
> that arose due to the size of elements in previously ill imported relation.
>
> This proposal was previously formally informed in brazilian talk list in
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/2017-March/012063.html .
> (Also this post here will be copied to brazilian talk list.)
>
> The discussions in Brazilian community: actually started in 6th march in
> Telegram channel of the brazilian community, where it has been carried on,
> and where we generally use to talk most (159 members, around some 80 users
> connecting daily and some 20 activelly communicating). Many members made
> remarks and suggestions about it and, after all arrangements, general
> aprovals for procedures and utility purpose.
>
> The purpose of this proposal: is to import the survey points published by
> the brazilian government agency for geographical data (called IBGE - (
> http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/geodesia/default_sgb_int.shtm).
>
> The source data: is all produced and published by IBGE.
> The government also publishes these data through the more general portal
> for brazilian spatial data (INDE: http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br<
> http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br/> - Menu: Redes Geodesicas), from
> where it was dowloaded.
>
> About the licenses for the data: as said in previous exchange of messages
> of other brazilian OSM member with IBGE officials [1], and as stated by the
> brazilian national law for access to information (known as "LAI"), all the
> government data, including IBGE, is free for access, not even requiring to
> say what for it is intended [2] (the exceptions quoted in the law must not
> even be published by the government). IBGE officials explicitly stated, as
> in previous quoted messages, it's free for OSM purposes, for copy, sharing
> and changes, since quoting the source, and not requiring further back
> communication.
>
> The aim of the import: is to have all these points with their precise
> coordinates provided by the government, placed in OSM brazilian map to help
> on aligning imagery, fixing borders, found places in remote regions, etc.
>
> It can be objected: found no survey point in imagery on the ground.
> That's true. Many things pedestrians have mapped can't be seen on
> sattelite imagery now, like door numbers, shop names, highway signals, and
> many other small things, perhaps also fire_hidrants, etc. It usually
> resides all on local mapper's word.
> Also imagery resolution is improving constantly, so perhaps not too later
> we all can see many more things on sattelite imagery.
> Anyway, the government, through its data itself and its official reports
> of survey points, states they are there on the ground.
>
> As a single example: there's a survey point (a small plate) over a
> boundary_stone in the Brazil-Venezuela-Guyana triple border, reported in
> [3]. It seems not visible in imagery, nor the boundary_stone. At least I
> still haven't found it (but I'm looking for). But just seeing this
> officialy reported point in JOSM (5.2018977222<tel:(201)%20897-7222>,
> -60.7375541111)[4] indicates this triple border in OSM is currently more
> than 1km far from that official measurement, thus deserving some revision.
>
> Other general informations:
> -All the objects proposed to import came previously converted by IBGE in
> WGS84 format in the original downloaded shape file.
> -There will be no relation (in OSM peculiar concept for relation) to be
> stablished between these individual points.
> -Only are meant to be imported the portion of the stations classified as
> in good conditions, leaving aside the ones destructed or not found as
> quoted in the official reports. So the final total number of points to be
> imported is smaller than in the original shp.
>
> The proposed tags are these (english translation or meaning below in
> parenthesis):
>
> description=Rede Geodésica do IBGE - Estação SAT DOPPLER
> (=IBGE Geodetic Network - <6 types of station, for: SAT DOPPLER; SAT
> GPS; Polygonal; Triangulation; Elevation Reference; Permanent GNSS>); by
> these 6 types of description= station...*... the data is aimed to be also
> accessible for recalling and maintence.
> ele=* (when geometric height available)
> man_made=survey_point
> note:en=Please: do not displace the point (official coordinates)
> note=Não deslocar o ponto (coordenadas originais do IBGE)
> (almost the same as note:en, with local exortation tone)
> ref:loc=São Félix do Xingu
> (the locality where the point is, perhaps even not mapped itself)
> ref=90970
> (the particular and unique name or number of the station)
> source=IBGE/INDE/BDG_DOPPoint.SHP
> (the original shape file)
> sourceːele = IBGE/MAPGEO2015
> (for Elevation Reference: MAPGEO2015 is the geoid model in Brazil)
> url=*
> (to access the complete official report, sometimes it has photos and
> other info that help a bit more to identify)
>
> The proposal is documented at:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_
> das_Redes_Geod%C3%A9sicas_do_IBGE
>
> Thank you in advance for your evaluation.
> - - - - - - - -
> [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-
> July/001981.html
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002031.html
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002032.html
> [2] http://www.acessoainformacao.gov.br/assuntos/conheca-seu-direito
> [3] "Localização: Na parte mais alta do Monte Roraima, em território
> brasileiro...", says, "Location: In the upper part of Mount Roraima, in
> brazilian territory..." (http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/
> bdg/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1=90128)
> [4] 05 ° 12 ' 06,8318 " N 60 ° 44 ' 15,1948 "W
> - - - - - - - -
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs
> -------------- Próxima Parte ----------
> Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
> URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/
> attachments/20170314/b00f83af/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Legenda do Digest
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-br mailing list
> Talk-***@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Fim da Digest Talk-br, volume 102, assunto 24
> *********************************************
>



--

Luis Cavalcanti da Cunha Bahiana

Geógrafo : Coordenação de Geografia - IBGE
Sérgio V.
2017-03-17 20:30:31 UTC
Permalink
Obrigado Luis, grande aporte seria.


Se ver qualquer coisa que precise melhorar na proposta em Inglês, fique à vontade pra corrigir. Pode mandar por aqui mesmo. Como preferir.


E se acharem que precisa fazer uma versão da wiki em inglês (:en)", também, à vontade.


Vi que você é do IBGE. Ótimo ter a presença, o interesse e conhecimento de vocês aqui também.

Pensei em focar na relevância das estações planialtimétricas (deixando de lado as estações gravimétricas e maregráficas, poucas).

Para as Referências de Nível, fiz a geração de Altitude Geométrica (h) a partir dos dados de Altitude Ortométrica (H), e (N) conforme o MAPGEO2015_v1_0.exe .

Qualquer coisa que acharem que mereça melhorar ou corrigir na proposta em geral, por favor, sintam-se à vontade para mandar seus aportes.

Obrigado


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs


________________________________
De: Luis Bahiana <***@gmail.com>
Enviado: sexta-feira, 17 de março de 2017 13:49
Para: talk-***@openstreetmap.org
Assunto: Re: [Talk-br] Digest Talk-br, volume 102, assunto 24

Se precisarem de ajuda para tradução ou versão coloco-me a disposição

2017-03-14 13:23 GMT-03:00 <talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>>:
Enviar submissões para a lista de discussão Talk-br para
talk-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-***@openstreetmap.org>

Para se cadastrar ou descadastrar via WWW, visite o endereço
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
ou, via email, envie uma mensagem com a palavra 'help' no assunto ou
corpo da mensagem para
talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>

Você poderá entrar em contato com a pessoa que gerencia a lista pelo
endereço
talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>

Quando responder, por favor edite sua linha Assunto assim ela será
mais específica que "Re: Contents of Talk-br digest..."


Tópicos de Hoje:

1. Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network
(man_made=survey_points) (Sérgio V.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:22:41 +0000
From: Sérgio V. <***@hotmail.com<mailto:***@hotmail.com>>
To: "talk-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-***@openstreetmap.org>" <talk-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-***@openstreetmap.org>>
Subject: [Talk-br] Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network
(man_made=survey_points)
Message-ID:
<***@RO1P152MB0810.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM<mailto:***@RO1P152MB0810.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Bom dia pessoal, estou preparando a proposta abaixo para o https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/.

Por favor sintam-se livres para examinar.

Antecipadamente obrigado.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hello.
I'm member of brazilian OSM users community.
I present here for discussion, and asking approval for, the proposal for the import of brazilian geodetic network of survey points (SGB - Sistema Geodésico Brasileiro).
Firstly, sorry if not good english. Also sorry for the technical problems that arose due to the size of elements in previously ill imported relation.

This proposal was previously formally informed in brazilian talk list in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/2017-March/012063.html .
(Also this post here will be copied to brazilian talk list.)

The discussions in Brazilian community: actually started in 6th march in Telegram channel of the brazilian community, where it has been carried on, and where we generally use to talk most (159 members, around some 80 users connecting daily and some 20 activelly communicating). Many members made remarks and suggestions about it and, after all arrangements, general aprovals for procedures and utility purpose.

The purpose of this proposal: is to import the survey points published by the brazilian government agency for geographical data (called IBGE - (http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/geodesia/default_sgb_int.shtm).

The source data: is all produced and published by IBGE.
The government also publishes these data through the more general portal for brazilian spatial data (INDE: http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br<http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br/> - Menu: Redes Geodesicas), from where it was dowloaded.

About the licenses for the data: as said in previous exchange of messages of other brazilian OSM member with IBGE officials [1], and as stated by the brazilian national law for access to information (known as "LAI"), all the government data, including IBGE, is free for access, not even requiring to say what for it is intended [2] (the exceptions quoted in the law must not even be published by the government). IBGE officials explicitly stated, as in previous quoted messages, it's free for OSM purposes, for copy, sharing and changes, since quoting the source, and not requiring further back communication.

The aim of the import: is to have all these points with their precise coordinates provided by the government, placed in OSM brazilian map to help on aligning imagery, fixing borders, found places in remote regions, etc.

It can be objected: found no survey point in imagery on the ground.
That's true. Many things pedestrians have mapped can't be seen on sattelite imagery now, like door numbers, shop names, highway signals, and many other small things, perhaps also fire_hidrants, etc. It usually resides all on local mapper's word.
Also imagery resolution is improving constantly, so perhaps not too later we all can see many more things on sattelite imagery.
Anyway, the government, through its data itself and its official reports of survey points, states they are there on the ground.

As a single example: there's a survey point (a small plate) over a boundary_stone in the Brazil-Venezuela-Guyana triple border, reported in [3]. It seems not visible in imagery, nor the boundary_stone. At least I still haven't found it (but I'm looking for). But just seeing this officialy reported point in JOSM (5.2018977222<tel:2018977222><tel:(201)%20897-7222>, -60.7375541111)[4] indicates this triple border in OSM is currently more than 1km far from that official measurement, thus deserving some revision.

Other general informations:
-All the objects proposed to import came previously converted by IBGE in WGS84 format in the original downloaded shape file.
-There will be no relation (in OSM peculiar concept for relation) to be stablished between these individual points.
-Only are meant to be imported the portion of the stations classified as in good conditions, leaving aside the ones destructed or not found as quoted in the official reports. So the final total number of points to be imported is smaller than in the original shp.

The proposed tags are these (english translation or meaning below in parenthesis):

description=Rede Geodésica do IBGE - Estação SAT DOPPLER
(=IBGE Geodetic Network - <6 types of station, for: SAT DOPPLER; SAT GPS; Polygonal; Triangulation; Elevation Reference; Permanent GNSS>); by these 6 types of description= station...*... the data is aimed to be also accessible for recalling and maintence.
ele=* (when geometric height available)
man_made=survey_point
note:en=Please: do not displace the point (official coordinates)
note=Não deslocar o ponto (coordenadas originais do IBGE)
(almost the same as note:en, with local exortation tone)
ref:loc=São Félix do Xingu
(the locality where the point is, perhaps even not mapped itself)
ref=90970
(the particular and unique name or number of the station)
source=IBGE/INDE/BDG_DOPPoint.SHP
(the original shape file)
sourceːele = IBGE/MAPGEO2015
(for Elevation Reference: MAPGEO2015 is the geoid model in Brazil)
url=*
(to access the complete official report, sometimes it has photos and other info that help a bit more to identify)

The proposal is documented at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_Redes_Geod%C3%A9sicas_do_IBGE

Thank you in advance for your evaluation.
- - - - - - - -
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/001981.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002031.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002032.html
[2] http://www.acessoainformacao.gov.br/assuntos/conheca-seu-direito
[3] "Localização: Na parte mais alta do Monte Roraima, em território brasileiro...", says, "Location: In the upper part of Mount Roraima, in brazilian territory..." (http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/bdg/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1=90128)
[4] 05 ° 12 ' 06,8318 " N 60 ° 44 ' 15,1948 "W
- - - - - - - -


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs
-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/attachments/20170314/b00f83af/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Legenda do Digest

_______________________________________________
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-***@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br


------------------------------

Fim da Digest Talk-br, volume 102, assunto 24
*********************************************



--

Luis Cavalcanti da Cunha Bahiana

Geógrafo : Coordenação de Geografia - IBGE
Helio Cesar Tomio
2017-03-17 20:30:36 UTC
Permalink
Texto muito bom Sérgio.
Toda a história a limpo, desmentindo aquela alegação que não houve
discussão anteriormente.

Em 17/03/2017 13:50, "Luis Bahiana" <***@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Se precisarem de ajuda para tradução ou versão coloco-me a disposição
>
> 2017-03-14 13:23 GMT-03:00 <talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>:
>
>> Enviar submissões para a lista de discussão Talk-br para
>> talk-***@openstreetmap.org
>>
>> Para se cadastrar ou descadastrar via WWW, visite o endereço
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
>> ou, via email, envie uma mensagem com a palavra 'help' no assunto ou
>> corpo da mensagem para
>> talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org
>>
>> Você poderá entrar em contato com a pessoa que gerencia a lista pelo
>> endereço
>> talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org
>>
>> Quando responder, por favor edite sua linha Assunto assim ela será
>> mais específica que "Re: Contents of Talk-br digest..."
>>
>>
>> Tópicos de Hoje:
>>
>> 1. Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network
>> (man_made=survey_points) (Sérgio V.)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:22:41 +0000
>> From: Sérgio V. <***@hotmail.com>
>> To: "talk-***@openstreetmap.org" <talk-***@openstreetmap.org>
>> Subject: [Talk-br] Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network
>> (man_made=survey_points)
>> Message-ID:
>> <***@RO1P152MB0810.LAMP15
>> 2.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Bom dia pessoal, estou preparando a proposta abaixo para o
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/.
>>
>> Por favor sintam-se livres para examinar.
>>
>> Antecipadamente obrigado.
>>
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>
>> Hello.
>> I'm member of brazilian OSM users community.
>> I present here for discussion, and asking approval for, the proposal for
>> the import of brazilian geodetic network of survey points (SGB - Sistema
>> Geodésico Brasileiro).
>> Firstly, sorry if not good english. Also sorry for the technical problems
>> that arose due to the size of elements in previously ill imported relation.
>>
>> This proposal was previously formally informed in brazilian talk list in
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/2017-March/012063.html
>> .
>> (Also this post here will be copied to brazilian talk list.)
>>
>> The discussions in Brazilian community: actually started in 6th march in
>> Telegram channel of the brazilian community, where it has been carried on,
>> and where we generally use to talk most (159 members, around some 80 users
>> connecting daily and some 20 activelly communicating). Many members made
>> remarks and suggestions about it and, after all arrangements, general
>> aprovals for procedures and utility purpose.
>>
>> The purpose of this proposal: is to import the survey points published by
>> the brazilian government agency for geographical data (called IBGE - (
>> http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/geodesia/default_sgb_int.shtm).
>>
>> The source data: is all produced and published by IBGE.
>> The government also publishes these data through the more general portal
>> for brazilian spatial data (INDE: http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br<
>> http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br/> - Menu: Redes Geodesicas), from
>> where it was dowloaded.
>>
>> About the licenses for the data: as said in previous exchange of messages
>> of other brazilian OSM member with IBGE officials [1], and as stated by the
>> brazilian national law for access to information (known as "LAI"), all the
>> government data, including IBGE, is free for access, not even requiring to
>> say what for it is intended [2] (the exceptions quoted in the law must not
>> even be published by the government). IBGE officials explicitly stated, as
>> in previous quoted messages, it's free for OSM purposes, for copy, sharing
>> and changes, since quoting the source, and not requiring further back
>> communication.
>>
>> The aim of the import: is to have all these points with their precise
>> coordinates provided by the government, placed in OSM brazilian map to help
>> on aligning imagery, fixing borders, found places in remote regions, etc.
>>
>> It can be objected: found no survey point in imagery on the ground.
>> That's true. Many things pedestrians have mapped can't be seen on
>> sattelite imagery now, like door numbers, shop names, highway signals, and
>> many other small things, perhaps also fire_hidrants, etc. It usually
>> resides all on local mapper's word.
>> Also imagery resolution is improving constantly, so perhaps not too later
>> we all can see many more things on sattelite imagery.
>> Anyway, the government, through its data itself and its official reports
>> of survey points, states they are there on the ground.
>>
>> As a single example: there's a survey point (a small plate) over a
>> boundary_stone in the Brazil-Venezuela-Guyana triple border, reported in
>> [3]. It seems not visible in imagery, nor the boundary_stone. At least I
>> still haven't found it (but I'm looking for). But just seeing this
>> officialy reported point in JOSM (5.2018977222<tel:(201)%20897-7222>,
>> -60.7375541111)[4] indicates this triple border in OSM is currently more
>> than 1km far from that official measurement, thus deserving some revision.
>>
>> Other general informations:
>> -All the objects proposed to import came previously converted by IBGE in
>> WGS84 format in the original downloaded shape file.
>> -There will be no relation (in OSM peculiar concept for relation) to be
>> stablished between these individual points.
>> -Only are meant to be imported the portion of the stations classified as
>> in good conditions, leaving aside the ones destructed or not found as
>> quoted in the official reports. So the final total number of points to be
>> imported is smaller than in the original shp.
>>
>> The proposed tags are these (english translation or meaning below in
>> parenthesis):
>>
>> description=Rede Geodésica do IBGE - Estação SAT DOPPLER
>> (=IBGE Geodetic Network - <6 types of station, for: SAT DOPPLER; SAT
>> GPS; Polygonal; Triangulation; Elevation Reference; Permanent GNSS>); by
>> these 6 types of description= station...*... the data is aimed to be also
>> accessible for recalling and maintence.
>> ele=* (when geometric height available)
>> man_made=survey_point
>> note:en=Please: do not displace the point (official coordinates)
>> note=Não deslocar o ponto (coordenadas originais do IBGE)
>> (almost the same as note:en, with local exortation tone)
>> ref:loc=São Félix do Xingu
>> (the locality where the point is, perhaps even not mapped itself)
>> ref=90970
>> (the particular and unique name or number of the station)
>> source=IBGE/INDE/BDG_DOPPoint.SHP
>> (the original shape file)
>> sourceːele = IBGE/MAPGEO2015
>> (for Elevation Reference: MAPGEO2015 is the geoid model in Brazil)
>> url=*
>> (to access the complete official report, sometimes it has photos and
>> other info that help a bit more to identify)
>>
>> The proposal is documented at:
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das
>> _Redes_Geod%C3%A9sicas_do_IBGE
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your evaluation.
>> - - - - - - - -
>> [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/
>> 001981.html
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002031.html
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002032.html
>> [2] http://www.acessoainformacao.gov.br/assuntos/conheca-seu-direito
>> [3] "Localização: Na parte mais alta do Monte Roraima, em território
>> brasileiro...", says, "Location: In the upper part of Mount Roraima, in
>> brazilian territory..." (http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/bd
>> g/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1=90128)
>> [4] 05 ° 12 ' 06,8318 " N 60 ° 44 ' 15,1948 "W
>> - - - - - - - -
>>
>>
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>
>> Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs
>> -------------- Próxima Parte ----------
>> Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
>> URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/attachment
>> s/20170314/b00f83af/attachment.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Legenda do Digest
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-br mailing list
>> Talk-***@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Fim da Digest Talk-br, volume 102, assunto 24
>> *********************************************
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Luis Cavalcanti da Cunha Bahiana
>
> Geógrafo : Coordenação de Geografia - IBGE
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-br mailing list
> Talk-***@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
>
>
Sérgio V.
2017-03-17 22:17:12 UTC
Permalink
Obrigado Tomio. De fato o Telegram não fica amplamente acessível.

Colocando por aqui como canal oficial do OSM é mais certo mesmo.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs


________________________________
De: Helio Cesar Tomio <***@gmail.com>
Enviado: sexta-feira, 17 de março de 2017 17:30
Para: OpenStreetMap no Brasil
Assunto: Re: [Talk-br] Digest Talk-br, volume 102, assunto 24

Texto muito bom Sérgio.
Toda a história a limpo, desmentindo aquela alegação que não houve discussão anteriormente.

Em 17/03/2017 13:50, "Luis Bahiana" <***@gmail.com<mailto:***@gmail.com>> escreveu:
Se precisarem de ajuda para tradução ou versão coloco-me a disposição

2017-03-14 13:23 GMT-03:00 <talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>>:
Enviar submissões para a lista de discussão Talk-br para
talk-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-***@openstreetmap.org>

Para se cadastrar ou descadastrar via WWW, visite o endereço
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
ou, via email, envie uma mensagem com a palavra 'help' no assunto ou
corpo da mensagem para
talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>

Você poderá entrar em contato com a pessoa que gerencia a lista pelo
endereço
talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>

Quando responder, por favor edite sua linha Assunto assim ela será
mais específica que "Re: Contents of Talk-br digest..."


Tópicos de Hoje:

1. Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network
(man_made=survey_points) (Sérgio V.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:22:41 +0000
From: Sérgio V. <***@hotmail.com<mailto:***@hotmail.com>>
To: "talk-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-***@openstreetmap.org>" <talk-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-***@openstreetmap.org>>
Subject: [Talk-br] Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network
(man_made=survey_points)
Message-ID:
<***@RO1P152MB0810.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM<mailto:***@RO1P152MB0810.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Bom dia pessoal, estou preparando a proposta abaixo para o https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/.

Por favor sintam-se livres para examinar.

Antecipadamente obrigado.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hello.
I'm member of brazilian OSM users community.
I present here for discussion, and asking approval for, the proposal for the import of brazilian geodetic network of survey points (SGB - Sistema Geodésico Brasileiro).
Firstly, sorry if not good english. Also sorry for the technical problems that arose due to the size of elements in previously ill imported relation.

This proposal was previously formally informed in brazilian talk list in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/2017-March/012063.html .
(Also this post here will be copied to brazilian talk list.)

The discussions in Brazilian community: actually started in 6th march in Telegram channel of the brazilian community, where it has been carried on, and where we generally use to talk most (159 members, around some 80 users connecting daily and some 20 activelly communicating). Many members made remarks and suggestions about it and, after all arrangements, general aprovals for procedures and utility purpose.

The purpose of this proposal: is to import the survey points published by the brazilian government agency for geographical data (called IBGE - (http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/geodesia/default_sgb_int.shtm).

The source data: is all produced and published by IBGE.
The government also publishes these data through the more general portal for brazilian spatial data (INDE: http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br<http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br/> - Menu: Redes Geodesicas), from where it was dowloaded.

About the licenses for the data: as said in previous exchange of messages of other brazilian OSM member with IBGE officials [1], and as stated by the brazilian national law for access to information (known as "LAI"), all the government data, including IBGE, is free for access, not even requiring to say what for it is intended [2] (the exceptions quoted in the law must not even be published by the government). IBGE officials explicitly stated, as in previous quoted messages, it's free for OSM purposes, for copy, sharing and changes, since quoting the source, and not requiring further back communication.

The aim of the import: is to have all these points with their precise coordinates provided by the government, placed in OSM brazilian map to help on aligning imagery, fixing borders, found places in remote regions, etc.

It can be objected: found no survey point in imagery on the ground.
That's true. Many things pedestrians have mapped can't be seen on sattelite imagery now, like door numbers, shop names, highway signals, and many other small things, perhaps also fire_hidrants, etc. It usually resides all on local mapper's word.
Also imagery resolution is improving constantly, so perhaps not too later we all can see many more things on sattelite imagery.
Anyway, the government, through its data itself and its official reports of survey points, states they are there on the ground.

As a single example: there's a survey point (a small plate) over a boundary_stone in the Brazil-Venezuela-Guyana triple border, reported in [3]. It seems not visible in imagery, nor the boundary_stone. At least I still haven't found it (but I'm looking for). But just seeing this officialy reported point in JOSM (5.2018977222<tel:2018977222><tel:(201)%20897-7222>, -60.7375541111)[4] indicates this triple border in OSM is currently more than 1km far from that official measurement, thus deserving some revision.

Other general informations:
-All the objects proposed to import came previously converted by IBGE in WGS84 format in the original downloaded shape file.
-There will be no relation (in OSM peculiar concept for relation) to be stablished between these individual points.
-Only are meant to be imported the portion of the stations classified as in good conditions, leaving aside the ones destructed or not found as quoted in the official reports. So the final total number of points to be imported is smaller than in the original shp.

The proposed tags are these (english translation or meaning below in parenthesis):

description=Rede Geodésica do IBGE - Estação SAT DOPPLER
(=IBGE Geodetic Network - <6 types of station, for: SAT DOPPLER; SAT GPS; Polygonal; Triangulation; Elevation Reference; Permanent GNSS>); by these 6 types of description= station...*... the data is aimed to be also accessible for recalling and maintence.
ele=* (when geometric height available)
man_made=survey_point
note:en=Please: do not displace the point (official coordinates)
note=Não deslocar o ponto (coordenadas originais do IBGE)
(almost the same as note:en, with local exortation tone)
ref:loc=São Félix do Xingu
(the locality where the point is, perhaps even not mapped itself)
ref=90970
(the particular and unique name or number of the station)
source=IBGE/INDE/BDG_DOPPoint.SHP
(the original shape file)
sourceːele = IBGE/MAPGEO2015
(for Elevation Reference: MAPGEO2015 is the geoid model in Brazil)
url=*
(to access the complete official report, sometimes it has photos and other info that help a bit more to identify)

The proposal is documented at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_Redes_Geod%C3%A9sicas_do_IBGE

Thank you in advance for your evaluation.
- - - - - - - -
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/001981.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002031.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002032.html
[2] http://www.acessoainformacao.gov.br/assuntos/conheca-seu-direito
[3] "Localização: Na parte mais alta do Monte Roraima, em território brasileiro...", says, "Location: In the upper part of Mount Roraima, in brazilian territory..." (http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/bdg/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1=90128)
[4] 05 ° 12 ' 06,8318 " N 60 ° 44 ' 15,1948 "W
- - - - - - - -


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs
-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/attachments/20170314/b00f83af/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Legenda do Digest

_______________________________________________
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-***@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br


------------------------------

Fim da Digest Talk-br, volume 102, assunto 24
*********************************************



--

Luis Cavalcanti da Cunha Bahiana

Geógrafo : Coordenação de Geografia - IBGE

_______________________________________________
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-***@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-***@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
g***@openmailbox.org
2017-03-17 22:29:24 UTC
Permalink
Por aqui, fica melhor registrado.


Também seria importante redirecionar as eventuais objeções para a lista
email. E, eu acho que o autor deveria fundamentá-las em português, para
a comunidade local avaliar e decidir se procedem.


Em 17-03-2017 19:17, Sérgio V. escreveu:
>
> Obrigado Tomio. De fato o Telegram não fica amplamente acessível.
>
> Colocando por aqui como canal oficial do OSM é mais certo mesmo.
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *De:* Helio Cesar Tomio <***@gmail.com>
> *Enviado:* sexta-feira, 17 de março de 2017 17:30
> *Para:* OpenStreetMap no Brasil
> *Assunto:* Re: [Talk-br] Digest Talk-br, volume 102, assunto 24
> Texto muito bom Sérgio.
> Toda a história a limpo, desmentindo aquela alegação que não houve
> discussão anteriormente.
>
> Em 17/03/2017 13:50, "Luis Bahiana" <***@gmail.com
> <mailto:***@gmail.com>> escreveu:
>
> Se precisarem de ajuda para tradução ou versão coloco-me a disposição
>
> 2017-03-14 13:23 GMT-03:00 <talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>>:
>
> Enviar submissões para a lista de discussão Talk-br para
> talk-***@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-***@openstreetmap.org>
>
> Para se cadastrar ou descadastrar via WWW, visite o endereço
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br>
> ou, via email, envie uma mensagem com a palavra 'help' no
> assunto ou
> corpo da mensagem para
> talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>
>
> Você poderá entrar em contato com a pessoa que gerencia a
> lista pelo
> endereço
> talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:talk-br-***@openstreetmap.org>
>
> Quando responder, por favor edite sua linha Assunto assim ela será
> mais específica que "Re: Contents of Talk-br digest..."
>
>
> Tópicos de Hoje:
>
> 1. Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network
> (man_made=survey_points) (Sérgio V.)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:22:41 +0000
> From: Sérgio V. <***@hotmail.com <mailto:***@hotmail.com>>
> To: "talk-***@openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:talk-***@openstreetmap.org>" <talk-***@openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:talk-***@openstreetmap.org>>
> Subject: [Talk-br] Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network
> (man_made=survey_points)
> Message-ID:
>
> <***@RO1P152MB0810.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
> <mailto:***@RO1P152MB0810.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Bom dia pessoal, estou preparando a proposta abaixo para o
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/>.
>
> Por favor sintam-se livres para examinar.
>
> Antecipadamente obrigado.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Hello.
> I'm member of brazilian OSM users community.
> I present here for discussion, and asking approval for, the
> proposal for the import of brazilian geodetic network of
> survey points (SGB - Sistema Geodésico Brasileiro).
> Firstly, sorry if not good english. Also sorry for the
> technical problems that arose due to the size of elements in
> previously ill imported relation.
>
> This proposal was previously formally informed in brazilian
> talk list in
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/2017-March/012063.html
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/2017-March/012063.html>
> .
> (Also this post here will be copied to brazilian talk list.)
>
> The discussions in Brazilian community: actually started in
> 6th march in Telegram channel of the brazilian community,
> where it has been carried on, and where we generally use to
> talk most (159 members, around some 80 users connecting daily
> and some 20 activelly communicating). Many members made
> remarks and suggestions about it and, after all arrangements,
> general aprovals for procedures and utility purpose.
>
> The purpose of this proposal: is to import the survey points
> published by the brazilian government agency for geographical
> data (called IBGE -
> (http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/geodesia/default_sgb_int.shtm
> <http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/geodesia/default_sgb_int.shtm>).
>
> The source data: is all produced and published by IBGE.
> The government also publishes these data through the more
> general portal for brazilian spatial data (INDE:
> http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br
> <http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br><http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br/
> <http://www.visualizador.inde.gov.br/>> - Menu: Redes
> Geodesicas), from where it was dowloaded.
>
> About the licenses for the data: as said in previous exchange
> of messages of other brazilian OSM member with IBGE officials
> [1], and as stated by the brazilian national law for access to
> information (known as "LAI"), all the government data,
> including IBGE, is free for access, not even requiring to say
> what for it is intended [2] (the exceptions quoted in the law
> must not even be published by the government). IBGE officials
> explicitly stated, as in previous quoted messages, it's free
> for OSM purposes, for copy, sharing and changes, since quoting
> the source, and not requiring further back communication.
>
> The aim of the import: is to have all these points with their
> precise coordinates provided by the government, placed in OSM
> brazilian map to help on aligning imagery, fixing borders,
> found places in remote regions, etc.
>
> It can be objected: found no survey point in imagery on the
> ground.
> That's true. Many things pedestrians have mapped can't be seen
> on sattelite imagery now, like door numbers, shop names,
> highway signals, and many other small things, perhaps also
> fire_hidrants, etc. It usually resides all on local mapper's word.
> Also imagery resolution is improving constantly, so perhaps
> not too later we all can see many more things on sattelite
> imagery.
> Anyway, the government, through its data itself and its
> official reports of survey points, states they are there on
> the ground.
>
> As a single example: there's a survey point (a small plate)
> over a boundary_stone in the Brazil-Venezuela-Guyana triple
> border, reported in [3]. It seems not visible in imagery, nor
> the boundary_stone. At least I still haven't found it (but I'm
> looking for). But just seeing this officialy reported point in
> JOSM (5.2018977222 <tel:2018977222><tel:(201)%20897-7222>,
> -60.7375541111)[4] indicates this triple border in OSM is
> currently more than 1km far from that official measurement,
> thus deserving some revision.
>
> Other general informations:
> -All the objects proposed to import came previously converted
> by IBGE in WGS84 format in the original downloaded shape file.
> -There will be no relation (in OSM peculiar concept for
> relation) to be stablished between these individual points.
> -Only are meant to be imported the portion of the stations
> classified as in good conditions, leaving aside the ones
> destructed or not found as quoted in the official reports. So
> the final total number of points to be imported is smaller
> than in the original shp.
>
> The proposed tags are these (english translation or meaning
> below in parenthesis):
>
> description=Rede Geodésica do IBGE - Estação SAT DOPPLER
> (=IBGE Geodetic Network - <6 types of station, for: SAT
> DOPPLER; SAT GPS; Polygonal; Triangulation; Elevation
> Reference; Permanent GNSS>); by these 6 types of description=
> station...*... the data is aimed to be also accessible for
> recalling and maintence.
> ele=* (when geometric height available)
> man_made=survey_point
> note:en=Please: do not displace the point (official coordinates)
> note=Não deslocar o ponto (coordenadas originais do IBGE)
> (almost the same as note:en, with local exortation tone)
> ref:loc=São Félix do Xingu
> (the locality where the point is, perhaps even not mapped
> itself)
> ref=90970
> (the particular and unique name or number of the station)
> source=IBGE/INDE/BDG_DOPPoint.SHP
> (the original shape file)
> sourceːele = IBGE/MAPGEO2015
> (for Elevation Reference: MAPGEO2015 is the geoid model in
> Brazil)
> url=*
> (to access the complete official report, sometimes it has
> photos and other info that help a bit more to identify)
>
> The proposal is documented at:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_Redes_Geod%C3%A9sicas_do_IBGE
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_Redes_Geod%C3%A9sicas_do_IBGE>
>
> Thank you in advance for your evaluation.
> - - - - - - - -
> [1]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/001981.html
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/001981.html>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002031.html
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002031.html>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002032.html
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-July/002032.html>
> [2]
> http://www.acessoainformacao.gov.br/assuntos/conheca-seu-direito
> <http://www.acessoainformacao.gov.br/assuntos/conheca-seu-direito>
> [3] "Localização: Na parte mais alta do Monte Roraima, em
> território brasileiro...", says, "Location: In the upper part
> of Mount Roraima, in brazilian territory..."
> (http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/bdg/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1=90128
> <http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/bdg/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1=90128>)
> [4] 05 ° 12 ' 06,8318 " N 60 ° 44 ' 15,1948 "W
> - - - - - - - -
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs
> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs>
> -------------- Próxima Parte ----------
> Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
> URL:
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/attachments/20170314/b00f83af/attachment.html
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/attachments/20170314/b00f83af/attachment.html>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Legenda do Digest
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-br mailing list
> Talk-***@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-***@openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Fim da Digest Talk-br, volume 102, assunto 24
> *********************************************
>
>
>
>
> --
> //
> Luis Cavalcanti da Cunha Bahiana
>
> Geógrafo : Coordenação de Geografia - IBGE
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-br mailing list
> Talk-***@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-***@openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-br mailing list
> Talk-***@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Sérgio V.
2017-03-18 03:11:01 UTC
Permalink
Tentando acertar também os cabeçalhos do tópico em re:, espero que agora vá certo.

Objeções (numeradas) da parte do DWG (em inglês em: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46795156 )
e fundamentação/soluções abaixo:

1) Relação:
- a relação muito grande envolvendo todos os nós de "survey_point" causou problemas em sistemas (problema técnico do osm2pgsql);
- não se deve usar relação para agrupar elementos que não os citados na wiki própria (problema não técnico, mais de convenção).
Este aparentemente foi o maior problema, o técnico. Também conforme comentários no https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/issues/713
Solução: Relação removida; (problema no osm2pgsql também resolvido pelos desenvolvedores).

2) Não foi discutido nas listas talk-br (esta) e talk-import (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/);
-Proposta inicial em https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/2017-March/012063.html ;
-depois seguiu no Telegram;
-no canal Telegram não é suficiente;
-o canal correto é a talk-list;
Solução: Trazido para cá novamente.

3) Contém "note=Não alterar: coordenadas originais do IBGE"
3.1) "Que uso pode ter um objeto que não se pode alterar no OSM?"
Argumentação:
A princípio, não se deve alterar nada já mapeado no OSM sem um motivo maior. Não se deve tirar as ruas de lugar.
Pontos com coordenadas precisas, mais ainda. Não garante nada, mas não custa colocar um aviso.
Há notas idênticas em importação oficialmente aprovada:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_France/Rep%C3%A8res_G%C3%A9od%C3%A9siques#Permanence_des_rep.C3.A8res)
"note=Ne pas déplacer ce point, cf. - Do not move this node, see..."
Solução explicativa:
Acrescentada explicação do que não deve ser alterado:
"note=Não deslocar o ponto (coordenadas originais do IBGE)"
"note:en=Please: do not displace the point (official coordinates)"
Foi o único comentário negativo neste ponto.

3.2) "Que uso pode ter ...? Qualquer um interessado em fazer qualquer coisa com survey_points pode apenas usar o shape file..."
Foi o único comentário negativo sobre utilidade de importar "survey_point" (que vi).

Não tem solução no momento:
Nada que tiver um shapefile precisaria estar no OSM. Nem estradas, nem rios. (Nem talvez fire_hydrants).
O OSM não valida utilidade: "Qualquer um pode contribuir com o que quiser" ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas ).

Mas sim, tem proposta de uso [1]:
"Ter no OSM pontos com coordenadas e altitude precisas, para aferição de imagens, limites de fronteiras, localidades não mapeadas, etc."
Limite de fronteira a revisar, p.ex., já foi encontrado com uma das estações: http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/bdg/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1=90128

4) Observador não conseguiu encontrar elemento físico no terreno, ao qual refere o ponto:
Não tem solução no momento:
-Grande parte dos dados do osm não são visíveis na imagem de satélite (número de porta; nome de loja; etc)
-Uma ainda muito maior parte não tem coordenadas precisas (somente aproximada, pelas imagens; ou de importação de vetores em baixa resolução);
-Survey points originais de órgãos oficiais são pontos com coordenadas precisas (eventualmente também altitude);
-As imagens de satélite melhoram ano após ano; os pontos estando lá, podem ser usados.
Também foi o único comentário negativo quanto a visibilidade de "survey_point".

A relação parece ter sido o maior problema. Não imaginava que tinha problemas técnicos.
Sim, de todo modo foi péssima ideia.
Removida.

A tag survey_point (marcos topográficos, geodésicos, de fronteira, etc) só tem sentido de existir pra que sejam mapeados no OSM.
Survey_point é pra ter coordenadas oficiais e precisas, em princípio (é diferente de estradas e rios, que podem ser mapeados só manualmente e aproximadamente).
Em vários locais do mundo já estão mapeados:
-ou manualmente (aproximadamente, com utilidade bem mais limitada);
-ou importados com coordenadas originais precisas, bem mais úteis (quando é liberado acesso a eles, como no Brasil).

A descrição completa da proposta em português tá na wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_Redes_Geod%C3%A9sicas_do_IBGE [1]


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs


>gorila em openmailbox.org gorila em openmailbox.org
>Sexta Março 17 22:29:24 UTC 2017
>Mensagem anterior: [Talk-br] Digest Talk-br, volume 102, assunto 24

>Por aqui, fica melhor registrado.
>Também seria importante redirecionar as eventuais objeções para a lista
>email. E, eu acho que o autor deveria fundamentá-las em português, para
>a comunidade local avaliar e decidir se procedem.
Nelson A. de Oliveira
2017-03-18 16:38:06 UTC
Permalink
Parece bom depois das correções.

O que eu faria (e falaria ao enviar para a lista imports) é
reaproveitar¹ os dados que já foram inseridos anteriormente (e depois
revertidos).
Tomando o cuidado apenas para ajustar o que precisa e não recriar as relações.

Assim se torna desnecessário criar novos objetos no mapa.

Sérgio, só pra ter mais garantia e também fornecer os dados para
análise (acho que vão querer ver na imports), tem como fazer os
ajustes e disponibilizar o arquivo .osm em algum lugar para verificar?

¹ é uma reversão da reversão: reverte, remove as relações, ajusta note
e outras informações, verifica 10 vezes
Sérgio V.
2017-03-18 17:19:58 UTC
Permalink
Ok, pode ser. Ótimo se der pra aproveitar os mesmo nós.

Estou fazendo mais umas coisas:

Colocando as urls dos relatórios de todos os 45.662 (tem descrições que ajudam a identificar no terreno, etc, muitos tem fotos). Só que tavam em outra fonte do IBGE .

(p. ex. ao invés do <ftp://geoftp.ibge.gov.br> ftp://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/RBMC/relatorio/Descritivo_MSAQ.pdf ... , estava no http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/bdg/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1=99614, sendo http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/bdg/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1= * , onde * é o código da estação - o ref=* )

Assim que terminar a conflação nos DBF dos SHP e converter pra .osm de novo envio pra um dropbox. Dá uns 30MB.

Obrigado


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs


________________________________
De: Nelson A. de Oliveira <***@gmail.com>
Enviado: sábado, 18 de março de 2017 13:38
Para: OpenStreetMap no Brasil
Assunto: Re: [Talk-br] Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network (man_made=survey_points)

Parece bom depois das correções.

O que eu faria (e falaria ao enviar para a lista imports) é
reaproveitar¹ os dados que já foram inseridos anteriormente (e depois
revertidos).
Tomando o cuidado apenas para ajustar o que precisa e não recriar as relações.

Assim se torna desnecessário criar novos objetos no mapa.

Sérgio, só pra ter mais garantia e também fornecer os dados para
análise (acho que vão querer ver na imports), tem como fazer os
ajustes e disponibilizar o arquivo .osm em algum lugar para verificar?

¹ é uma reversão da reversão: reverte, remove as relações, ajusta note
e outras informações, verifica 10 vezes
Sérgio V.
2017-03-20 04:29:02 UTC
Permalink
Envio o link para download do arquivo.


Após convertidos para .OSM os SHP das redes geodésicas (é isolado do OSM; não é conflação sobre o revertido).

Revisei e coloquei mais todos os dados de "ele" (Altitude Geométrica) das demais redes (não só RN). E para onde não tinha A.Geométrica para "ele=*", mas tinha Altitude Ortométrica, converti "ele=*" a partir desta com o software "mapgeo" do IBGE.

E conservei os dados de Altitude Ortométrica como "ele:orto=*".

Se bem que o mais importante são as coordenadas mesmo. Mas as altitudes também são dados úteis. Já que tão lá, se pode colocar o que tem. Já que teve que revisar mesmo a importação, aproveitar pra colocar mais o que tem.


Link no dropbox:


https://www.dropbox.com/s/d3y9nvg5y806i93/Redes%20Geod%C3%A9sicas-convertidos%20para%20osm-validacao.rar?dl=0

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Contém:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

1)ARQUIVO: "1REDES GEODESICAS - TOTAL - 06 redes - 45622 objects.osm"

O total das 6 redes: convertidas dos SHP primeiro isoladamente; depois juntadas, tudo em 1 só .osm. (Para separar, selecionar por "description=*" , conforme os 06 tipos). (é isolado do OSM; não é conflação sobre o revertido).

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2) ARQUIVO: "1Validacao interna -1519 warnings nodes same pos -3114 objects.osm"

Validação nos 45622 nós (sem baixar survey_points existentes no OSM).

"warning = nodes at same position" : 3114 nós. Entram com as coordenadas assim, vindos dos SHP originais. São pontos no mesmo marco físico, mas de redes diferentes. Isoladas, cada rede não tem sobreposição (só 3 casos nos RN). Só quando junta as 6 redes todas.


"Warning" não é erro...

Mas se precisar, dá pra fundir, fazer "merge", mas aí muda o número de objetos (se for pra re-reverter).

E se fizer "merge", como manter as diferentes "ref=*" e "url=*" de cada um deles ? Concatenar com ";" as tags diferentes? "ref=X;Y;Z... / url=X;Y;Z...? Tem algum meio de fazer isso automaticamente? Através do JOSM?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3) ARQUIVO: "1Validação externa -OSM overpass -warnings nodes same pos -17 objects "

O resultado da validação após baixados via overpass os survey_points existentes no OSM no Brasil: "warning = nodes at same position" : 17 objetos


Importações isoladas de survey_points, de outras épocas (nem todos tem source=IBGE... ou coisa parecida.).

Dá pra fazer "replace geometry" nestes 17 (mantendo o histórico), para eliminar os "warnings ".

Mas aí a examinar individualmente como ficam as tags ref=*, etc, em comparação com o a ser importado.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Acho que era isso por enquanto. A ver se daria mesmo pra fazer isto em cima dos revertidos. Teve 01 nó que vi que não sei se eles esqueceram de fora quando reverteram: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4731118821 . Não sei se não dá problema no número total a repor, se fosse re-reverter. Vou tentando testar como ficaria.
Senão se propõe mesmo uma re-reversão "simples" (se é que isto pode ser chamado de simples) sem adicionar mais dados para os mesmos pontos. Ficando só como tavam (sem as relações claro).

Valeu.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs


________________________________
De: Nelson A. de Oliveira <***@gmail.com>
Enviado: sábado, 18 de março de 2017 13:38
Para: OpenStreetMap no Brasil
Assunto: Re: [Talk-br] Proposal of import: Brazilian Geodetic Network (man_made=survey_points)

Parece bom depois das correções.

O que eu faria (e falaria ao enviar para a lista imports) é
reaproveitar¹ os dados que já foram inseridos anteriormente (e depois
revertidos).
Tomando o cuidado apenas para ajustar o que precisa e não recriar as relações.

Assim se torna desnecessário criar novos objetos no mapa.

Sérgio, só pra ter mais garantia e também fornecer os dados para
análise (acho que vão querer ver na imports), tem como fazer os
ajustes e disponibilizar o arquivo .osm em algum lugar para verificar?

¹ é uma reversão da reversão: reverte, remove as relações, ajusta note
e outras informações, verifica 10 vezes
Loading...